Manufacturer-provided information Source: Manufacturer-provided information Regulatory status: Not verified Last reviewed: 29 July 2026

iFIND TBR and IFQ: Evidence and Regulatory Questions for India

The available evidence for iFIND TBR and IFQ is limited to manufacturer brochures and instructions for use. CDSCO registration is not verified. Indian labs should ask about registration, the IS1081/IS1087 conflict, the 85-minute/120-minute discrepancy, service, and Hindi documentation.

Purpose

This article sets out what evidence currently exists for the iFIND TBR and IFQ kits, and what regulatory questions Indian laboratories should ask before considering the platform. All parameters are manufacturer-provided.

What Evidence Exists

The available evidence for the iFIND TBR and IFQ kits is limited to manufacturer brochures and instructions for use — evidence level B. Specifically:

  • Manufacturer product brochures.
  • Manufacturer technical specification sheets.
  • Manufacturer instructions for use (IFU), some in draft form.

What is not available:

  • No independent peer-reviewed clinical study has been confirmed.
  • No multicentre trial data is available.
  • No systematic review or meta-analysis is available.
  • No Indian-market evaluation data is available.

iFIND TBR — manufacturer-provided parameters

  • Detects: M. tuberculosis complex + rifampicin resistance.
  • Targets: IS6110, IS1081 / IS1087 (conflict), rpoB.
  • LoD: 10 CFU/mL (TB), 100 CFU/mL (rifampicin).
  • Turnaround time: 85 min in one source, 120 min in another — unresolved.

iFIND IFQ — manufacturer-provided parameters

  • Detects: isoniazid + fluoroquinolone resistance.
  • Targets: katG, inhA, gyrA.
  • LoD: 100 CFU/mL.
  • Turnaround time: 120 min.
  • Does not detect injectable-drug resistance.

Documented Conflicts

Two conflicts in the manufacturer documentation are documented and unresolved:

  • IS1081 vs IS1087 (EVC-002) — manufacturer documents disagree on which insertion sequence the TBR kit targets. IS1081 and IS1087 may be distinct genetic elements with different characteristics.
  • 85 min vs 120 min (EVC-001) — one manufacturer source states an 85-minute turnaround time while another states 120 minutes. The relationship between the two figures has not been clarified.

A third conflict concerns product naming (IFQ vs MDR, EVC-003) and is also unresolved.

CDSCO Registration Status

The CDSCO registration status of the iFIND instrument, the TBR kit, and the IFQ kit is not verified. This means SinoBio Access has not independently confirmed any CDSCO registration. It does not mean the products are unregistered, and it does not mean they are registered. Until an official CDSCO registration document is independently confirmed, the status remains "not verified", and the platform should not be deployed clinically in India.

Regulatory Questions Indian Labs Should Ask

Registration

  1. Is the iFIND instrument registered with the CDSCO? Request the registration certificate and verify it in the official registry.
  2. Is the TBR reagent kit registered with the CDSCO? Request the certificate.
  3. Is the IFQ reagent kit registered with the CDSCO? Request the certificate.
  4. What is the validity period of each registration?
  5. Do the registered specifications match the manufacturer's marketing claims?

Technical

  1. Which insertion sequence does the TBR kit actually target — IS1081 or IS1087? Request written clarification.
  2. What is the definitive turnaround time for TBR — 85 minutes or 120 minutes? Request written clarification.
  3. What is the registered name of the IFQ kit — IFQ or MDR?
  4. What are the registered specimen types?
  5. Has any Indian clinical evaluation been performed?

Service and documentation

  1. Is there an authorised service centre in India?
  2. Are consumables (cartridges) available through a reliable local supply chain?
  3. Is the IFU and software available in English and, where needed, in Hindi?
  4. What training is available for Indian laboratory staff?

Validation

  1. What reference method will your laboratory use for local validation?
  2. What sample size does your laboratory's procedures require?
  3. How will your laboratory handle the IS1081 / IS1087 and turnaround-time conflicts in its validation report?

Evidence Boundary

All parameters in this article are manufacturer-provided (evidence level B). No independent clinical study has been confirmed. CDSCO registration is not verified. The documented conflicts remain unresolved.

Important Note

This article does not claim CDSCO registration, FDA approval, or WHO approval for any iFIND product. SinoBio Access is not a distributor and does not sell medical devices. Indian laboratories should not deploy the platform clinically until CDSCO registration is confirmed and local validation is complete.

Local problem

Indian laboratories need to know what evidence supports the iFIND TBR and IFQ kits and what regulatory questions to ask, but the available evidence is limited to manufacturer materials and CDSCO status is not verified.

Chinese solution scope

The iFIND TBR kit (TB plus rifampicin resistance; targets IS6110, IS1081/IS1087, rpoB) and IFQ kit (isoniazid plus fluoroquinolone resistance; targets katG, inhA, gyrA), documented from manufacturer sources.

Evidence boundary

All parameters are manufacturer-provided (evidence level B). No independent peer-reviewed clinical study has been confirmed. CDSCO registration is not verified. The IS1081/IS1087, 85-minute/120-minute, and IFQ/MDR conflicts are unresolved.

Local implementation gap

CDSCO registration not verified, local service not confirmed, Hindi documentation not available, and the documented conflicts require manufacturer clarification before clinical deployment.

Sources and evidence

All technical parameters are manufacturer-provided unless otherwise stated.

  • Manufacturer document Manufacturer-provided information Technical specifications, brochures, and IFU documents provided by the manufacturer (Kunpeng Gene / iFIND).
  • Regulatory status Local regulatory status not verified Local regulatory status has not been independently verified for this market.
  • Document discrepancy Document discrepancy identified Conflicting information exists between manufacturer sources. See evidence boundary above.